Gerson therapy is not a valid or effective treatment for cancer. It should never be taken in lieu of genuine treatments like surgery , radiation therapy radiotherapy o. Read more. They must meet the same safety requirements as traditional foods.
There is some controversy over the benefits and risks of GMO foods. In this article, we discuss the pros and cons of GMO crops, taking into account their potential effects on human health and the environment.
Manufacturers use genetic modification to give foods desirable traits. For example, they have designed two new varieties of apple that turn less brown when cut or bruised. The reasoning usually involves making crops more resistant to diseases as they grow. Manufacturers also engineer produce to be more nutritious or tolerant of herbicides. Crop protection is the main rationale behind this type of genetic modification. Plants that are more resistant to diseases spread by insects or viruses result in higher yields for farmers and a more attractive product.
All of these factors contribute to lower costs for the consumer. They can also ensure that more people have access to quality food. Because genetically engineering foods is a relatively new practice, little is known about the long-term effects and safety. There are many purported downsides, but the evidence varies, and the main health issues associated with GMO foods are hotly debated.
Research is ongoing. This section discusses the evidence for a range of drawbacks that people often associate with GMO foods. Some people believe that GMO foods have more potential to trigger allergic reactions.
This is because they may contain genes from an allergen — a food that prompts an allergic reaction. It is worth noting that there have been no reports of allergic effects of any GMO foods currently on the market.
Some researchers believe that eating GMO foods can contribute to the development of cancer. They argue that because the disease is caused by mutations in DNA, it is dangerous to introduce new genes into the body.
However, they note that no evidence of harm is not the same as proof of safety and that reaching a conclusion will require more research. There is a small chance that the genes in food can transfer to cells the body or bacteria in the gut.
Through years of careful evaluation, there is no reliable evidence that GM foods cause the same changes in a living organism. One such product is close to commercialization. Potatoes produce a small amount of acrylamide, a potential carcinogen, when heated to high temperatures. A potato has been engineered not to produce that compound, and that leads to safer food. A prime example is the comparative safety assessment process used to evaluate differences between newly developed GMO crops and their conventional counterparts.
This assessment helps to fully understand the implications of genetic modification on DNA, RNA and resulting proteins and plant composition. This process is used in all international crop biotechnology guidelines and every single GMO product goes through this assessment.
In the spring of , The National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine NAS issued a comprehensive report where a panel of more than 20 scientists, researchers, agricultural and industry experts reviewed over 20 years of data since GMOs were introduced, including nearly studies and tests and European and North American health data.
0コメント