Why are conductance and ionization are related process




















But owing to mobility differences, cations and ions do not usually carry identical fractions of the charge. Transference numbers are often referred to as transport numbers ; either term is acceptable in the context of electrochemistry. For a solution of a simple binary salt,. Let the cell be divided into three [imaginary] sections as we examine the distribution of cations and anions at three different stages of current flow.

Transference numbers can be determined experimentally by observing the movement of the boundary between electrolyte solutions having an ion in common, such as LiCl and KCl:. You may have noticed from the tables above that the hydrogen- and hydroxide ions have extraordinarily high equivalent conductivities and mobilities.

This is a consequence of the fact that unlike other ions which need to bump and nudge their way through the network of hydrogen-bonded water molecules, these ions are participants in this network. By simply changing the H 2 O partners they hydrogen-bond with, they can migrate "virtually".

In effect, what migrates is the hydrogen-bonds, rather than the physical masses of the ions themselves. This process is known as the Grothuss Mechanism. The shifting of the hydrogen bonds occurs when the rapid thermal motions of adjacent molecules brings a particular pair into a more favorable configuration for hydrogen bonding within the local molecular network.

It is remarkable that this virtual migration process was proposed by Theodor Grotthuss in — just five years after the discovery of electrolysis, and he didn't even know the correct formula for water; he thought its structure was H—O—O—H.

These two diagrams will help you visualize the process. Of course, the same mechanism is operative in the absence of an external electric field, in which case all of the hops will be in random directions. Table 1 displays the molar conductivities at infinite dilution obtained from the linear fits of Figure 2 and the expected results from the literature.

The greatest absolute error in this set is observed for KCl and is It is not possible to attribute the imprecision of the obtained data to the conductivity measurements, as the remarkable linearity of the plots in Figure 1 indicate that no random error was associated with the estimate of the slopes.

The errors are, therefore, systematic for each experiment, and can be attributed to the preparation of the solutions, or the improper control of temperature or calibration of the conductivity meter.

These errors are acceptable for an undergraduate laboratory experiment and are similar to those obtained using more concentrated solutions and the use of the Kohlrausch equation, as reported by Eslek and Tulpar.

The use of the drop by drop strategy was also employed for the study of the conductivity of acetic acid HAc. At the range of concentrations achieved by the present experimental procedure, the degree of dissociation of HAc varies between 0.

The degree of dissociation is computed from. Figure 3 Study of the conductivity of weak electrolyte solutions: acetic acid as an example. B Conductivity as a function of the number of drops added. C Conductivity as a function of the concentration of the solution. D The inverse of the molar conductivity as a function of the molar conductivity times the concentration, which corresponds to the Ostwald dilution law plot.

From the intercept and slope of the linear fit, it is possible to obtain the limiting molar conductivity and the dissociation constant of the electrolyte. Because of the range of dissociation degrees probed, the conductivity varies non-linearly with the concentration of the acid.

Figures 3B and 3C show the conductivities obtained by students as a function of the number of drops added to the solution and as a function of the concentration of the acid. Clearly, the conductivity increases less than linearly with concentration, because of the decreasing degree of dissociation.

The analysis of the conductivity of weak electrolytes, taking into account the degree of dissociation, was performed with Ostwald dilution law Equation 2. From the intercept, the molar conductivity at infinite dilution was computed and from that the dissociation constant using the slope of the linear fit. Figure 3D shows results obtained by students for the application of the Ostwald dilution law to the conductivity measurements of acetic acid. The linearity of the plot is clear, and the intercept and the slope of the plots can be used to compute the limiting molar conductivity and dissociation constant of the acid.

Table 2 shows the final results obtained. In this article, we describe the implementation a simple method to prepare solutions of very low sub-millimolar concentration, to be used in the study of the conductivity of electrolyte solutions in general chemistry or physical chemistry undergraduate laboratories.

The method consists in preparing solutions with increasing concentration by dropping the electrolyte solution into an initial sample of deionized water. The procedure saves material and is robust in the sense that the manipulation of the solutions is minimal, such that the students frequently obtain satisfactory results. The range of concentrations obtained is such that the limiting molar conductivities of strong electrolytes can be obtained with good accuracy without the use of Kohlrausch law, directly from the molar conductivity of the solutions, which is essentially constant at the concentration ranges sampled.

The method can be used also to study the dissociation equilibrium of weak electrolytes by means of the Ostwald dilution law.

The method was satisfactorily applied in first-year General Chemistry and second-year Physical Chemistry laboratories. Those ions are produced by a process analogous to the one described in Scheme 1. This process, called the auto-ionization of water, is depicted in Scheme 2. In other words, approximately two out of every 10 million water molecules react to form a hydronium ion and a hydroxide ion. The acidity constant, K a , for water is 1.

Because of the auto-ionization of water, it is never possible to have an aqueous solution in which the concentration of hydronium ion is less than 1 x 10 -7 M. Exercise 2 The K a value of HF in water is 6. Is HF a stronger or a weaker acid than acetic acid? Which compound is the weaker acid? Write an equation depicting the transfer of a proton from tert -butyl alcohol to a water molecule.

Which would contain a higher concentration of hydronium ions, a 0. Exercise 5 Write equations depicting the auto-ionization of a. Exercise 6 Assume you dissolve molecules of an acid HA in water. The equivalent factor of the electrolyte is usually the total charge on either anions or cations present in one formula unit of it. It may be equal to basicity in case of acids or equal to acidity in case of bases. Temperature: The conductance of an electrolyte solution increases with increase in the temperature due to increase in the extent of inonization.

Heavily hydrated ions show low conductance values due to larger size. As a result, lithium salts show lower conductivities compared to those of cesium salts in water. Explanation: Since the concentration decreases, one can expect decrease in equivalent conductivity due to decrease in available number of ions per unit volume. However the increase in volume V factor more than compensates this effect. The volume must be increased in order to get one equivalent of electrolyte since the concentration is decreased.

Hence the net effect is increase in equivalent conductivity. The equivalent conductivity reaches a maximum value at certain dilution and does not change upon further dilution i.

This concentration is also termed as infinite dilution. At this dilution, the ionization of even the weak electrolyte is complete. However at infinite dilution i.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000